30 de out. de 2025

Anne Rice e a Guerrilha Literária: A Primeira Reinvenção/Anne Rice and the Literary Guerrilla: The First Reinvention




Anne Rice e a Guerrilha Literária: A Primeira Reinvenção

“If I created a woman the way I wanted her to be, for many people it didn't work. With male characters, I could achieve almost anything I wanted.”
— Anne Rice, Called Out of Darkness (2008)

Aos sete anos, no primeiro dia de aula, a menina chamada Howard Allen O'Brien tomou sua primeira decisão de autora. Disse à freira que seu nome era "Anne". Aquele ato de auto-criação, de reescrever a própria identidade para enfrentar o mundo, foi o ensaio para tudo que viria a seguir.

Anne Rice compreendeu, antes mesmo de se tornar escritora, uma verdade incômoda do mercado literário: a liberdade criativa tem um teto de vidro, e esse teto é feito de preconceito de gênero. Nos anos 1970, ela percebeu que o mesmo erotismo que era celebrado como "filosófico" entre homens era rebaixado a "romance barato" quando centrado em mulheres.

“Love scenes involving males were treated with dignity. A book involving a man and woman was dismissed as ‘a cheap romance.’”

Diante disso, muitas autoras recorreram a pseudônimos masculinos. Rice, porém, já havia escolhido seu nome de guerra. Sua estratégia não foi de confronto direto, mas de guerrilha literária.

Ela não se escondeu. Manteve "Anne", uma declaração feminina em um gênero dominado por vozes masculinas. Sua tática não era derrubar os muros do cânone com uma investida frontal, mas infiltrar-se neles. Seu Cavalo de Troia foi o corpo do vampiro masculino.

1. A Estratégia do Corpo Masculino

Dentro da fortaleza da literatura gótica, Rice introduziu uma sensibilidade radicalmente feminina – a intensidade emocional, a profundidade do desejo, a vulnerabilidade como força – disfarçada na figura socialmente aceitável do herói trágico masculino.

Louis é o Feminino Camuflado:

Nele, Rice projetou a sensibilidade, a introspecção e a culpa que, em um corpo de mulher, seriam lidos como fraqueza. Através dele, ela pôde explorar a angústia moral sem ser acusada de sentimentalismo barato.

“Readers could love a melancholy hero like the vampire Louis, or fall in love with the passionate and irrepressible Lestat. But they were offended by the vampire Pandora, and uncomfortable with the young Mona Mayfair.”

Lestat é o Ônix Simbólico:

Ele se tornou o “órgão que as mulheres não têm”, na frase que ela própria colocou na boca de Gabrielle. Através de Lestat, Rice pôde performar uma agressividade, uma ambição e um apetite sexual desmedidos – características que, em uma autora ou em uma protagonista, seriam punidas com o rótulo de “impertinente” ou “excessiva”. Lestat era sua máscara de liberdade.

“She talked... about my being... for her the organ that women don’t have.”
— The Vampire Lestat

2. O Preço da Infiltração e a Sombra do Pacto

Toda estratégia de guerrilha exige sacrifícios. Para que Lestat e Louis pudessem desfrutar de uma complexidade sem limites, as personagens femininas de Rice frequentemente pagaram o preço.

“The excesses of Lestat were seen as charming; Mona was seen as impertinent. Belinda was ignored because she was not a stereotype.”

Claudia, a mulher-criança, é punida com a morte por sua rebeldia. Gretchen, a freira, é um farol de pureza descartado após servir ao desenvolvimento moral do herói. Baby Jenks é puro trauma instrumentalizado. Enquanto os vampiros homens eram libertos para uma existência de angústia filosófica e prazer, as mulheres permaneciam, em grande parte, aprisionadas em arquétipos – a virgem, a prostituta, a bruxa, a criança eterna.

Era o lado sombrio do pacto: a voz feminina de Rice só pôde ecoar com tanta força porque sussurrou através de gargantas masculinas.

3. A Vitória na Assinatura

“I came to avoid using women except in ways that wouldn’t invite this dismissal… With male characters, I could achieve almost anything I wanted.”

A genialidade final de Rice, porém, estava na assinatura. Ao publicar sob o nome Anne, ela realizou o golpe de mestre: não permitiu que o sistema se apropriasse de sua voz anonimamente. Pelo contrário, forçou o mundo a reconhecer que aquela visão de mundo vasta, sensual e filosófica era obra da mesma menina que, no primeiro dia de aula, decidiu quem iria ser.

“I can’t say that I literally reacted to this experience… I didn’t set out to do anything about it. But it had its inevitable effect.

O sucesso estrondoso de suas Crônicas Vampirescas não foi uma vitória apesar de ser Anne, mas uma vitória de Anne. Ela não se infiltrou no cânone para se esconder; infiltrou-se para conquistá-lo e, uma vez dentro, hastear sua bandeira com o nome que ela própria escolheu.

Epílogo: O Legado da Estratégia

Anne Rice não foi uma traidora da causa feminina; foi uma de suas mais astutas estrategistas. Em um mundo que ditava regras para mulheres e autoras, ela já vinha, desde o primeiro dia de aula, reescrevendo o próprio roteiro.

Sua obra é um testemunho permanente de que a transgressão mais eficaz começa pela coragem de nomear a si mesma. E que, às vezes, o ato mais radical é sussurrar, com a voz sedutora de um vampiro, uma verdade imortal com um nome de mulher.


Anne Rice and the Literary Guerrilla: The First Reinvention

“If I created a woman the way I wanted her to be, for many people it didn’t work. With male characters, I could achieve almost anything I wanted.”
— Anne Rice, Called Out of Darkness (2008)

At the age of seven, on her first day of school, the girl named Howard Allen O'Brien made her first authorial decision. She told the nun her name was “Anne.” That act of self-creation—of rewriting her own identity to face the world—was the inaugural rehearsal for everything that followed.

Anne Rice understood, even before she became a writer, an inconvenient truth about the literary marketplace: creative freedom has a glass ceiling, and that ceiling is made of gender bias. In the 1970s, she realized that the same eroticism applauded as “philosophical” between men was dismissed as “cheap romance” when it sprang from a woman.

“Love scenes involving males were treated with dignity. A book involving a man and woman was dismissed as ‘a cheap romance.’”

Faced with this, many female authors resorted to male pseudonyms. Rice, however, had already chosen her nom de guerre. Her strategy was not one of direct confrontation, but of literary guerrilla warfare.

She did not hide. She kept “Anne”—a feminine declaration in a genre dominated by male voices. Her tactic was not to tear down the walls of the canon with a frontal assault, but to infiltrate them. Her Trojan Horse was the body of the male vampire.

1. The Strategy of the Male Body

Within the gothic literature fortress, Rice introduced a radically feminine sensibility—emotional intensity, the depth of desire, vulnerability as strength—disguised in the socially acceptable figure of the tragic male hero.

Louis is the Camouflaged Feminine:

In him, Rice projected the sensitivity, introspection, and guilt that, in a woman’s body, would be read as weakness. Through Louis, she could explore moral anguish without being accused of cheap sentimentality.

“Readers could love a melancholy hero like the vampire Louis, or fall in love with the passionate and irrepressible Lestat. But they were offended by the vampire Pandora, and uncomfortable with the young Mona Mayfair.”

Lestat is the Symbolic Onyx:

He became the “organ that women don’t have,” in the phrase she herself put into Gabrielle's mouth. Through Lestat, Rice could perform unbridled aggression, ambition, and sexual appetite—characteristics that, in a female author or protagonist, would be penalized with the label of “impertinent” or “excessive.” Lestat was her mask of freedom.

“She talked... about my being... for her the organ that women don’t have.”
— The Vampire Lestat

2. The Price of Infiltration and the Shadow of the Pact

Every guerrilla strategy requires sacrifices. For Lestat and Louis to enjoy boundless complexity, Rice’s female characters often paid the price.

“The excesses of Lestat were seen as charming; Mona was seen as impertinent. Belinda was ignored because she was not a stereotype.”

Claudia, the woman-child, is punished with death for her rebellion. Gretchen, the nun, is a beacon of purity discarded after serving the hero’s moral development. Baby Jenks is pure instrumentalized trauma. While the male vampires enjoyed an existence of philosophical anguish and pleasure, the women remained imprisoned in archetypes—the virgin, the whore, the witch, the eternal child.

It was the dark side of the pact: Anne’s feminine voice could only echo with such force because it whispered through masculine throats.

3. The Victory in the Signature

“I came to avoid using women except in ways that wouldn’t invite this dismissal… With male characters, I could achieve almost anything I wanted.”

Rice’s final stroke of genius lay in the signature. By publishing under the name Anne, she achieved the master blow: she did not allow the system to appropriate her voice anonymously. On the contrary—she forced the world to acknowledge that this vast, sensual, and philosophical worldview was the work of the same girl who, on the first day of school, decided who she was going to be.

“I can’t say that I literally reacted to this experience… I didn’t set out to do anything about it. But it had its inevitable effect.”

The phenomenal success of The Vampire Chronicles was not a victory despite being Anne—it was a victory by Anne. She did not infiltrate the canon to hide—she infiltrated to conquer it. And, once inside, she hoisted her flag with the name she chose for herself.

Epilogue: The Legacy of the Strategy

Anne Rice was not a traitor to the feminine cause; she was one of its most astute strategists. In a world that dictated rules for women and female authors, she had been, since the very first day of school, rewriting her own script.

Her work is a permanent testament that the most effective transgression begins with the courage to name oneself. And that, sometimes, the most radical act is to whisper—with the seductive voice of a vampire—an immortal truth, using a woman’s name.

Confissão Pública (Restrita): Diário de Loucura nº 29

 


Confissão Pública (Restrita): Diário de Loucura nº 29


Pensar é um vício para os ansiosos — mesmo para os que, assim como eu, disfarçam a ânsia e a virada no estômago com um sorriso.

Antes de adormecermos, e antes que a independência se abata sobre nós, gostaria de compartilhar — não um pensamento, mas uma chusma deles — que, assim ajuntados, tomam forma de algo que costumo classificar como cisma.

Cismada estou com a ideia curiosa que mora na cabeça de quase todos.
Qual ideia?
A de que nós, mulheres, ao defender causas — justas ou injustas — devemos fazê-lo com suavidade e calma para, como ensinam às meninas quase sempre, não “perder a razão”.

Suponho que as razões masculinas, banhadas que são em privilégio, devam ser muito arrumadas e penteadas com esmero — mas podem descabelar-se e até gritar sem jamais perder-se.

Até o que escrevemos deveria ser bem-comportado.

Ah! Como eu amo Hilda Hilst. Sylvia Plath. Clarice Lispector — sobretudo Clarice, e suas mulheres feitas só de pensamento.
E Hilda, a bacante, compondo impudicos poemas só para ver no que fariam deles.

Eu acho que estou feliz hoje.
Mas esqueci como é ser feliz, então não tenho certeza.


Public Confession (Restricted): Diary of Madness No. 29


Thinking is a vice for the anxious — even for those who, like me, disguise the nausea and the turn in the stomach with a smile.

Before we fall asleep, and before independence falls upon us, I’d like to share — not a single thought, but a whole flock of them — that, once gathered, take the shape of something I usually call a brooding.

I’ve been brooding over that curious idea that lives in almost everyone’s head.
Which idea?
The one that says we, women, when defending causes — fair or unfair — must do so softly and calmly, so as not to “lose our reason,” as girls are so often taught.

I suppose that masculine reasons, bathed as they are in privilege, must be neatly combed and well-arranged — yet they may ruffle their hair and shout without ever losing themselves.

Even what we write is expected to behave.

Ah, how I love Hilda Hilst. Sylvia Plath. Clarice Lispector — especially Clarice, and her women made entirely of thought.
And Hilda, the bacchante, composing immodest poems just to see what others would make of them.

I think I’m happy today.
But I’ve forgotten what happiness feels like, so I’m not entirely sure.

27 de out. de 2025

A Gulag Narrativa de Anne Rice: Gênero, Poder e o Medo do Feminino Anne Rice’s Narrative Gulag: Gender, Power, and the Fear of the Feminine

🕯️ A Gulag Narrativa de Anne Rice: Gênero, Poder e o Medo do Feminino

Anne Rice’s Narrative Gulag: Gender, Power, and the Fear of the Feminine


Anne Rice não ama o feminino — ela o teme, o culpa e o controla, ainda que o deseje.

O que ela ama é a estética do feminino: o sofrimento belo, o sangue como perfume, o corpo que brilha antes de ser destruído. Mas o feminino em si — o poder autônomo, caótico, criador — ela mantém acorrentado. Ela o adora à distância, como quem teme que a chama consuma o altar.

Rice escreveu uma mitologia de espelhos: homens que sentem como mulheres, mulheres que agem como deuses, e deuses que vivem com medo do próprio reflexo. Sob o verniz da imortalidade, há uma prisão — a gulag narrativa onde o feminino é venerado e punido na mesma respiração.

O Feminino Tolerado: Beleza, Sofrimento e Estagnação

Nas Crônicas Vampirescas, a mulher é sublime enquanto sofre, e perigosa quando age. Claudia é perfeita até desejar envelhecer. Akasha é divina até sonhar com poder. Gabrielle é livre até se afastar do filho. Pandora, Merrick, Maharet — todas pagam caro por se mover.

Rice estetiza o feminino, mas nunca o humaniza. Transfigura-o em mito, em símbolo, em ícone — e o neutraliza. O feminino que age é punido; o feminino que sofre é adorado.

Louis: A Mulher Que Anne Rice Enviou para a Prisão

Louis é a mulher de Anne Rice. Não porque seja feminino em aparência, mas porque carrega tudo o que ela só permitiu existir num corpo masculino: sensibilidade, culpa, compaixão, melancolia. Ele é o experimento bem-sucedido de domesticação do feminino — o que pode chorar sem ser ridicularizado, duvidar sem ser silenciado.

Mas Rice não o salva — ela o condena. Louis é o prisioneiro da sua estética, mantido vivo apenas para sofrer com elegância. Ao contrário dos outros vampiros, ele não ganha força com o tempo. Permanece frágil, humano, vacilante — porque sua fraqueza é lucrativa, dentro e fora da ficção. Rice não tem coragem de matá-lo, mas se esforça para esvaziá-lo.

Ele é desejado por todos,
desde que se mantenha frágil e humano.

O Fetiche da Fragilidade

Em Rice, a dor é erotismo. Ela transforma a vulnerabilidade em moeda emocional e o sofrimento em espetáculo. Amar Louis é amar o que não reage. Desejá-lo é desejar o que continua dócil, mesmo após a morte.

Ele é a boneca que fala, o crucifixo que suspira. Todos o querem, mas ninguém o quer livre. Ele é a Claudia que sobreviveu — porque nasceu homem.

Conclusão: O Medo da Deusa

No altar de Anne Rice, o sangue é belo, mas o ventre é proibido. Ela canoniza a dor e excomunga a criação. Toda vez que uma mulher toca o poder, é sacrificada. Toda vez que o feminino tenta nascer em forma plena, é trancado num corpo masculino e chamado de Louis.

O feminino livre seria Akasha;
o feminino controlado é Louis. E assim Rice perpetua sua própria liturgia: adora o espelho, destrói a mulher.


🕯️ Anne Rice’s Narrative Gulag: Gender, Power, and the Fear of the Feminine

Anne Rice does not love the feminine — she fears it, blames it, and controls it, even as she desires it.

What she loves is the aesthetic of the feminine: beautiful suffering, blood as perfume, the body that gleams before being destroyed. But the feminine itself — autonomous, chaotic, creative power — she keeps shackled. She adores it at a distance, as one who fears the flame will consume the altar.

Rice wrote a mythology of mirrors: men who feel like women, women who act like gods, and gods who live in fear of their own reflection. Beneath the varnish of immortality lies a prison — the narrative gulag where the feminine is worshiped and punished in the same breath.

The Tolerated Feminine: Beauty, Suffering, and Stagnation

In the Vampire Chronicles, the woman is sublime while she suffers, and dangerous when she acts. Claudia is perfect until she desires to age. Akasha is divine until she dreams of power. Gabrielle is free until she steps away from motherhood. Pandora, Merrick, Maharet — all pay dearly for movement.

Rice aestheticizes the feminine, but never humanizes it. She transmutes it into myth, into symbol, into icon — and thus neutralizes it. The feminine that acts is punished; the feminine that suffers is adored.

Louis: The Woman Anne Rice Sent to Prison

Louis is Anne Rice’s woman. Not because of feminine appearance, but because he carries everything she allowed to exist only in a male body: sensitivity, guilt, compassion, melancholy. He is the successful experiment of domesticating the feminine — the one who may weep without ridicule, doubt without being silenced.

But Rice does not save him — she condemns him. Louis is a prisoner of her aesthetics, kept alive only to suffer with elegance. Unlike other vampires, he does not gain strength over time. He remains fragile, human, wavering — because his weakness is profitable, in fiction and beyond. Rice lacks the nerve to kill him, but she works hard to hollow him out.

He is desired by all,
so long as he remains fragile and human.

The Fetish of Fragility

In Rice, pain is eroticism. She turns vulnerability into emotional currency and suffering into spectacle. To love Louis is to love what does not react. To desire him is to desire what remains docile, even after death.

He is the doll that speaks, the crucifix that sighs. Everyone wants him, but no one wants him free. He is the Claudia who survived — because he was born a man.

Conclusion: The Fear of the Goddess

On Anne Rice’s altar the blood is beautiful, but the womb is forbidden. She canonizes pain and excommunicates creation. Every time a woman touches creative power, she is sacrificed. Every time the feminine attempts to be born in full, it is locked into a male body and called Louis.

The free feminine would be Akasha;
the controlled feminine is Louis. And thus Rice perpetuates her own liturgy: she worships the mirror, and she destroys the woman.

26 de out. de 2025

Public Confession (Restricted): Logbook of Insanity No. 26

 


Public Confession (Restricted): Logbook of Insanity No. 26


Each day is a thread woven into the vast silence of this drifting ship, though somewhere on Earth, the Sun rises quietly, unaware of me.

I am neither skeptic nor believer. I move within the space of an undefined whole, nameless, genderless, or a goddess hidden among what I cannot name. Sometimes I sense something more, but leaving it unnamed comforts me — I know it exists, intangible, far from the small human fantasies that imprison bodies, minds, and hearts.

I have wandered through organized religions, all of them silent cages for women: each ritual a chain, each sacred word a veil over the eyes.

I hear. I see. Not often, but sometimes the invisible threads reveal themselves through others. Who am I to deny the visions of another?

Once, a disciple of Carlos Castaneda told me he had fought a vast shadow attacking me. That day, the universe whispered its synchronicities: I had just awoken from a nightmare that weighed like iron on my chest. My scream still trembled in the air, and he spoke of the battle without my uttering a single word. It was as if my fear had traveled through invisible cords and shaped itself into his voice.

Soon after, he fell ill. Perhaps the shadow had not rested. Perhaps the fight continued on planes unseen, where no eyes reach, where only echoes linger.

All of this unfolded across the threads of social media and instant messages — modern witchcraft, invisible currents connecting minds and destinies. Without these digital threads, I would never have known the first shadow, never felt the confirmation whispered by the dream itself.

Here, madness is neither proof nor disease. It is a map of the invisible, a place where chaos and order intertwine, where each synchronicity is a star and each scream a spell cast into the void.

The unspeakable gains a name. The inner self finds an adversary. Nightmares become narrative, and shadows — real or imagined — become ritual, chant, memory of what we are when we touch the supernatural.

Between the void of space and the Sun rising somewhere else in the world, the ship continues its silent voyage. And I continue, recording, sensing, naming what cannot be measured, yet pulses endlessly, infinite, within me — a sacred rhythm, a liturgy of the unseen.